Think about NASA’s Apollo 11 mission, the first successful moon landing. 

On the surface, a small team of astronauts achieved the impossible. But behind them stood 400,000 scientists, engineers and support staff, all working together across disciplines, time zones and impossible odds. Every part of the team had to operate at a world-class level, from the launch pad to mission control to the final splashdown.

Or look at Pixar.

The studio’s groundbreaking hits like Toy Story and Finding Nemo weren’t born from individual genius alone. They came from carefully built teams that trusted each other enough to scrap bad ideas, fight for better ones and blend technical excellence with creative vision.

Stories like these prove that great teams make extraordinary things happen.

But teams like that don’t just come together by coincidence. They’re developed intentionally, often guided by models that help leaders and members navigate the messy, human side of collaboration.

Understanding these team development models is essential for building teams that don’t just function, but thrive. In this guide, we’ll walk through the most widely used team development models, what makes them effective and how to choose the right one for your organization.

What is a team development model?

A team development model is a structured framework that outlines how teams form, evolve and achieve high performance. These models identify predictable stages of collaboration and provide strategies for moving through each phase effectively.

The goal of using a team development model is simple: Help teams work better together, faster, and with fewer growing pains. By understanding common team dynamics, leaders can intervene early to prevent misalignment, resolve conflict and accelerate progress toward shared goals.

▶️ 25 useful performance metrics for employees

Why team development models matter

High-performing teams don’t just click, someone intentionally and carefully develops them. Without a structured approach, teams often struggle with miscommunication, conflicting priorities and lack of trust and clarity.

Team development models offer a roadmap to tackle these issues head-on. They improve employee engagement, increase retention and drive productivity by creating clarity and alignment.

Teams that intentionally develop are more adaptable, more resilient and more capable of delivering consistent results, even under pressure.

The most common team development models

Each team development model brings a different lens to team building. Here’s a breakdown of the most widely used models and when to consider them:

1. Tuckman’s Team Development Model

Psychologist Bruce Tuckman introduced this model in 1965 to describe how teams evolve through five stages on their way to high performance. Each stage brings its own dynamics, challenges and leadership needs.

1. Forming: Teams are polite and guarded, with unclear roles and goals. Leaders should provide structure, set expectations and help members connect.
2. Storming: Tensions rise as members challenge ideas and compete for status. Leaders must manage conflict, clarify purpose and set ground rules.
3. Norming: Trust builds, roles become clear and collaboration improves. Leaders should reinforce norms and encourage shared leadership.
4. Performing: Teams operate at a high level, innovating and solving problems independently. Leaders focus on removing obstacles and sustaining momentum.
5. Adjourning: As teams disband, leaders should facilitate reflection, recognize achievements and support transitions.

Tuckman’s model works because most teams experience these stages naturally. It helps leaders diagnose problems early and apply the right strategies at the right time. 

But challenges can still surface. Teams may get stuck in Storming, rush past alignment during Norming or move too quickly through Adjourning, which can hurt morale and future collaboration. Leaders who spot these risks early can course-correct with clear communication, realignment efforts and structured team check-ins.

▶️ Internal communication strategy that actually works (+ template)

2. The Hackman Model of Team Effectiveness

Developed by organizational psychologist J. Richard Hackman, this model focuses less on team stages and more on the conditions teams need to succeed. Hackman identified five essential factors that drive long-term team effectiveness.

1. Clear direction: Teams need a compelling, well-defined purpose. Leaders must ensure goals are meaningful, focused and motivating.
2. Enabling structure: Team design matters—roles should be clear, the right mix of skills should be present and norms for working together should be strong.
3. Supportive context: Teams perform better when they have access to resources, information and rewards that reinforce good teamwork.
4. Expert coaching: Timely coaching helps teams navigate challenges, improve processes and maintain motivation, especially during critical moments.
5. Team mindset: Teams that believe in collective ownership of success—rather than relying on individual efforts—are more resilient and effective.

The Hackman model works because it emphasizes setting teams up for success from the start instead of constantly reacting to problems. It reminds leaders that even talented teams will struggle if critical conditions are missing. Still, teams can run into trouble if they have strong skills but lack clarity, if incentives discourage collaboration or if momentum fades without timely coaching. Leaders who proactively build the right environment give their teams a real shot at sustained high performance.

📽️ Watch our episode on How to Transform Frontline Managers Into Leaders

3. The Robbins and Judge Model

The Robbins and Judge model highlights how team effectiveness depends on both team characteristics and internal processes. It offers a clear, cause-and-effect view of how teams function in modern organizations.

• Team characteristics: Factors like team size, diversity, role clarity and skill sets influence how well a team can perform. Leaders must assemble teams thoughtfully based on the work ahead.
• Team processes: Communication, conflict management, goal-setting and decision-making processes determine whether a team’s potential turns into real results.

This model works because it shows that simply putting smart people together is not enough. Teams also need strong processes to succeed. Still, challenges can surface if teams have the right mix of people but communication breaks down or conflict goes unmanaged. Leaders who focus equally on who is on the team and how the team works together can prevent performance gaps early.

4. The GRPI Model (goals, roles, processes, interpersonal relationships)

The GRPI model, introduced by Richard Beckhard, provides a simple framework for diagnosing and improving team effectiveness by aligning four core elements.

• Goals: Teams need clear, shared objectives that everyone understands and buys into.
• Roles: Each team member must know their responsibilities and how their work fits into the bigger picture.
• Processes: Teams need agreed ways of working—how they make decisions, solve problems and communicate.
• Interpersonal relationships: Trust, respect and collaboration between team members create a foundation for everything else.

The GRPI model works because it addresses team dysfunction at its root. Misalignment often starts with unclear goals, fuzzy roles or broken processes, not interpersonal issues alone. Some of the common challenges in this model include teams misfiring if leaders assume alignment without verifying it or ignore brewing relationship issues. Leaders who regularly check and recalibrate these four areas can keep teams on track and performing smoothly.

5. The Lencioni Model (5 dysfunctions of a team)

Patrick Lencioni’s model flips the script by identifying what breaks teams rather than what builds them, offering a practical approach to tackling common dysfunctions.

• Absence of trust: Without vulnerability-based trust, teams struggle to have honest conversations. Leaders must model openness and encourage it across the team.
• Fear of conflict: Teams that avoid productive debate settle for artificial harmony. Leaders need to create a safe space for disagreement.
• Lack of commitment: Without healthy conflict, teams struggle to commit fully to decisions. Leaders should drive clarity and shared buy-in.
• Avoidance of accountability: When commitment is weak, accountability suffers. Leaders must hold people to standards openly and fairly.
• Inattention to results: If individual goals outweigh team success, performance drops. Leaders must reinforce a results-first mindset.

The Lencioni model works because it focuses on the emotional and relational roots where many team problems quietly begin. Still, teams can run into trouble if they try to skip straight to accountability or results without first building trust and encouraging healthy conflict. Leaders who work through dysfunctions one layer at a time build stronger, more resilient teams over the long run.

▶️ Frontline SOS: How to deal with difficult customers

6. The Katzenbach and Smith Model (High-Performing Teams)

Jon Katzenbach and Douglas Smith developed this model after studying what makes some teams outperform others. They found that high performance depends on three critical factors.

• Commitment to a common purpose: High-performing teams share a deep sense of mission. Leaders must help define and reinforce that purpose constantly.
• Complementary skills: Teams need a balanced mix of technical skills, problem-solving abilities and interpersonal strengths to tackle challenges effectively.
• Mutual accountability: Success is shared, and so is responsibility. Leaders must encourage a culture where members hold themselves and each other accountable.

This model works because it goes beyond structure and gets to the emotional and practical glue that holds teams together. But it’s not foolproof, as teams might rally around a shared purpose yet still fall short if their skills aren’t balanced or accountability slips. Leaders who consistently strengthen all three areas can turn a good team into an exceptional one.

▶️ The complete guide to skill development: How to drive growth at scale

7. The T7 Model of Team Effectiveness

The T7 model, introduced by Michael Lombardo and Robert Eichinger, identifies seven factors that drive or block team success, five internal and two external.

• Thrust: A shared, compelling goal that energizes the team.
• Trust: Confidence in each other’s intentions and capabilities.
• Talent: The right skills and expertise distributed across the team.
• Teaming skills: The ability to collaborate, communicate and resolve conflict.
• Task skills: Competence in executing specific team tasks.
• Team leader fit: Leadership that matches the team’s needs and context.
• Team support from the organization: Access to resources, information and backing from leadership.

This model works because it recognizes that both internal dynamics and external conditions shape how teams perform. Still, strong skills alone are not enough if trust is missing or organizational support falls short. Leaders who focus on strengthening both the team itself and the environment around it give their teams a better chance at lasting success.

8. The Google Model (Project Aristotle)

Google’s Project Aristotle studied hundreds of teams to find out why some excel while others stall. Their research identified five key dynamics that separate strong teams from the rest.

• Psychological safety: Members feel safe taking risks without fear of embarrassment or retaliation.
• Dependability: Team members reliably complete high-quality work on time.
• Structure and clarity: Roles, plans and goals are clear and understood.
• Meaning: Team members find purpose in their work.
• Impact: Teams believe their work matters and contributes to larger goals.

This model works because it focuses on human needs rather than just technical competence. Still, teams can run into trouble if they prioritize structure without nurturing psychological safety or assume dependability without making sure it is really there. Leaders who invest in building psychological safety first create the environment the other dynamics need to take root and grow.

▶️ Explore our Q&A with Laura Delizonna, Stanford University instructor, author and coach: Building psychological safety with your frontline

9. The Drexler-Sibbet Team Performance Model

Developed by Allan Drexler and David Sibbet, this model maps out the full lifecycle of a team through seven stages, split between two main phases: team formation and team performance.

• Orientation: Team members seek clarity about purpose and membership.
• Trust building: Trust is developed through shared expectations and openness.
• Goal clarification: Teams define objectives and outcomes clearly.
• Commitment: Members buy into the goals and the team’s structure.
• Implementation: The team puts plans into action with coordination and energy.
• High performance: The team optimizes collaboration, innovation and results.
• Renewal: Teams reflect, celebrate achievements and refocus for future work.

This model works because it shows that team development is not always a straight line. Teams may need to cycle back to earlier stages as new challenges emerge. Still, teams can run into trouble if they rush through goal-setting without first building trust or skip reflection when it is time to renew. Leaders who guide teams carefully through each stage lay the groundwork for lasting high performance.

10. The Thomas-Kilmann Conflict Mode Model

Kenneth Thomas and Ralph Kilmann developed this model to help teams understand and improve how they handle conflict. It identifies five primary conflict-handling modes based on levels of assertiveness and cooperativeness.

• Competing: Assertive and uncooperative, used when quick, decisive action is needed.
• Collaborating: Assertive and cooperative, finding a win-win solution for all parties.
• Compromising: Moderate assertiveness and cooperativeness—everyone gives something up.
• Avoiding: Unassertive and uncooperative, delaying or sidestepping conflict.
• Accommodating: Unassertive but cooperative, prioritizing others’ needs over your own.

This model works because it makes conflict styles visible and manageable. Teams can adjust their approach depending on the situation. Still, teams may fall into patterns like overusing avoidance or settling for compromise when true collaboration would lead to better results. Leaders who build awareness and flexibility around conflict modes help teams resolve issues faster and strengthen relationships.

▶️ Difficult customers are on the rise. How organizations can help workers deal with them

Choosing the right team development model

Not every model fits every situation. Some of the factors you need to consider before deploying a model include:

• Team size: Larger teams often need more structure (GRPI, Hackman).
• Industry: Tech startups may benefit from Lencioni or Google’s models; regulated industries may prefer GRPI.
• Project complexity: Drexler-Sibbet for long-term projects; Tuckman for short-term projects.
• Company culture: Conservative cultures lean toward Hackman or Katzenbach-Smith; innovative cultures may prefer Google or Lencioni.

Once you have a sense of your team’s needs, here is a quick look at which models work best for different types of challenges:

Choosing the right model is just the start. How you apply and adapt it over time will ultimately shape your team’s success.

Practical tips for implementing a team development model

Great teams are built, not born. Understanding and applying a team development model gives you a real edge by helping you catch problems early, build resilience and unlock better performance. But no single model fits every situation perfectly. Success comes from applying a model thoughtfully and adapting as your team grows.

• Start by diagnosing where your team is today. 
• Choose one model and stick to it, since jumping between frameworks usually causes confusion.
• Train team leaders to recognize key stages or risk factors and equip them to guide their teams through transitions. 
• Actively manage movement between stages, whether it is helping teams resolve early conflicts or pushing through periods of low engagement.

Measure progress through surveys, retrospectives and real performance data. If something is not working, adjust. These models are tools, not rigid rules. Keep developing because even the best teams always have room to grow.

Build stronger teams. Create a connected frontline. Discover how Axonify helps you engage, develop and unify your people every day.

See it in action