Download the 2026
Frontline Operations Report
Find out what’s actually behind your numbers
Just Launched | Flagship annual research
The gap between your best location and your worst isn’t a talent problem. It’s an execution problem.
The 2026 Frontline Operations Report reveals what’s driving performance variance across locations, and why the same strategy, the same standards and the same investment produce different results depending on where they land.
Built on responses from 1,594 frontline employees, managers and corporate leaders, this report identifies the systemic gaps between what leadership builds and what operations delivers, and what those gaps are costing in revenue, customer experience and brand consistency.
Closing those gaps doesn’t require more hiring. The capacity is already inside your operation.
Download the 2026
Frontline Operations Report

The execution gap is real
Your best and worst locations have the same strategy. The same products. The same promotions. The same training programs. One of them is delivering. The other is re-executing and doing the same work twice, losing margin on every shift.
The question is no longer whether frontline workers want to do the job. It’s whether the operation around them is built to let them do it consistently.
What’s driving the gap:
None of these are people problems. They’re operating system problems. And they’re recoverable through operational improvements, not the labor line.
What the 2026 data reveals
60% of frontline workers cite short staffing as their primary execution barrier, but only 35% of corporate leaders say the same. Leadership is 25 to 33 points more optimistic about frontline conditions than the people doing the work across every metric in this report.
When resources and operational investments are shaped by that perception, they’re being allocated against an incomplete picture. You can’t fix a problem you can’t see at the right scale.


46% of location managers say new initiatives arrive without adequate support to execute them well. 52% of regional managers—the people responsible for making those initiatives happen—report the same.
Each launch that lands poorly makes the next one harder. Trust erodes. Workarounds become standard. A promotion designed to drive 8% comp sales that executes well in 65% of locations isn’t delivering 8%. It’s delivering a fraction of it, unevenly, while the window to course-correct has already closed.
87% of managers say they communicate updates effectively. Only 56% of frontline workers agree. That 31-point gap is where strategy becomes inconsistency: shift by shift, location by location.
59% of frontline workers prefer hearing updates directly from their manager. Communication strategies that bypass that channel, or treat managers as just another distribution point, are strategies that don’t reach the floor.


54% of task assignments still happen verbally with no verification, no audit trail, and no visibility into whether instructions reached every person they needed to reach. The same initiative can land 10 different ways across 10 different locations, and headquarters won’t know which version is running until it shows up in performance data.
Fragmented systems and limited tools create a strategy problem, not just an IT one. The organizations closing the execution gap fastest are connecting the tools they have and making them smarter.
59% of frontline workers rely on their manager as their primary communication channel, but managers are stretched beyond coaching capacity. When that system is overtaxed, execution variance compounds across every location, every launch, every shift.
The manager is the operating system of the frontline. When managers have the time, tools and support to lead instead of cover gaps, every other metric in this report improves. When they don’t, every gap gets wider.

Performance still varies significantly from location to location, shift to shift, launch to launch and that variance has a measurable cost.
For a 500-location retailer, recovering just 5 hours of rework time per location per week returns roughly $2.5 million in labor annually. That’s capacity already inside your operation, being lost to execution gaps, not headcount shortfalls.
The organizations closing that gap are making deliberate operational changes:
Original data from 1,594 frontline employees, managers and corporate leaders across retail, food service, hospitality, grocery and service operations that sheds light on:


The Frontline Operations Report is Axonify’s annual study on the gap between what leadership builds
and what operations delivers.
Built from original research across frontline employees, managers and corporate leaders in retail, food service, hospitality, grocery and service operations, the report surfaces the execution barriers, performance drivers and systemic gaps that determine whether strategy produces consistent results, or consistent intentions.
Each year, the report gives HR and operations leaders the data to stop explaining variance and start closing it.
Find out what’s actually behind your numbers